Friday, July 31, 2026

Apple Loses Key Executive: AI Talent War Heats Up Global Politics

Tech giants are competing for AI talent with high salaries while automating existing roles, highlighting a workforce divide.

WAR Mobilization: Kim Jong Un Orders Emergency Party Plenum To Finalize The Nation’s New ‘Battle Readiness’ Plan

North Korea's Rodong Sinmun celebrates its 80th anniversary and plans a plenary session to discuss future policies and party preparations.

BIO USA 2025: Korea’s Pavilion Grows, Deals Multiply, and New Biotech Faces Emerge

BIO USA 2025 showcased South Korea's biotech presence, with significant participation from firms like Samsung Biologics and Lotte Biologics.

Coupang Data Breach: U.S. Shareholders Seek ISDS Arbitration Against South Korea

EconomyCoupang Data Breach: U.S. Shareholders Seek ISDS Arbitration Against South Korea
The appearance of Coupang\'s headquarters in Songpa-gu, Seoul 2025.12.29 / News1
The appearance of Coupang’s headquarters in Songpa-gu, Seoul 2025.12.29 / News1

In connection with the Coupang data breach incident, shareholders of Coupang’s U.S. subsidiary have notified the government of their intent to initiate international investment dispute (ISDS) arbitration.

The Ministry of Justice announced on Thursday afternoon that U.S. shareholders of Coupang, including Greenox and Altimeter (hereinafter referred to as the claimants), submitted a notice of intent to arbitrate to the South Korean government, citing the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (FTA).

A notice of intent to arbitrate is a written document in which claimants express their intention to initiate arbitration to the opposing country. While it does not constitute a formal arbitration request, claimants can formally initiate arbitration 90 days after submitting the notice.

According to the notice of intent, the claimants asserted that following the data breach incident at Coupang on December 1, 2025, the National Assembly and executive branch targeted Coupang with various administrative actions and threatening statements across multiple fronts.

They argued that these actions violated several obligations under the Korea-U.S. FTA, including fair and equitable treatment (Article 11.5(1)), national treatment and most-favored-nation treatment (Articles 11.3 and 11.4), comprehensive protection (Article 11.5(2)), and prohibition of expropriation (Article 11.6).

Furthermore, the claimants alleged that these actions resulted in damages amounting to billions of dollars.

The Ministry of Justice stated that it will establish a joint response system centered around the International Investment Dispute Response Team to thoroughly examine the legal issues related to the notice of intent to arbitrate. The Ministry also pledged to actively respond by disclosing relevant information to enhance public awareness and procedural transparency.

Check Out Our Content

Check Out Other Tags:

Most Popular Articles